Current:Home > MyPoinbank Exchange|Colorado ranching groups sue state, federal agencies to delay wolf reintroduction -ProfitLogic
Poinbank Exchange|Colorado ranching groups sue state, federal agencies to delay wolf reintroduction
SignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-08 14:13:45
FORT COLLINS,Poinbank Exchange Colo. — Two Colorado ranching organizations have filed a complaint against state and federal agencies requesting the reintroduction of wolves into the state be delayed.
The lawsuit filed Monday by the Colorado Cattlemen’s Association and Gunnison County Stockgrowers Association comes just weeks before state officials were to release up to 10 gray wolves under a 2020 state law. The suit names the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Colorado Parks and Wildlife as defendants, according to a Tuesday news release from the CCA, which represents more than 6,000 producers and landowners.
The two organizations believe Colorado Parks and Wildlife and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service violated the National Environmental Policy Act by not conducting a thorough environmental impact statement and that reintroduction should be delayed until that process is complete.
Both organizations have opposed wolf introduction since voters narrowly passed the ballot initiative to begin reintroducing wolves by the end of 2023. Colorado Parks and Wildlife is in the process of capturing wolves in northeast Oregon to serve as initial release animals.
The complaint is the first legal action taken since the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's 10(j) rule under the Endangered Species Act went into effect in Colorado on Dec. 8. The rule designates gray wolves in Colorado as experimental and provides state officials and livestock producers more management flexibility of wolves, including the killing wolves in situations where wolves are caught in the act of killing livestock or where chronic depredation is occurring.
Colorado to release gray wolves:Here's when, where and why.
Controversial release plan has divided communities
The plan to release the wolves has divided urban and rural communities.
Many ranchers and farmers noted the risks wolves could pose to humans and livestock. The state's wolf reintroduction plan was largely supported by urban residents and supporters of the plan say wolves are a natural part of the ecosystem in the West.
State officials said they hope that the gradual release of the wolves captured from Oregon would eventually create self-sustaining packs of 150 to 200 animals. In the 1940s, the wolf population in Colorado was nearly eradicated and now the state is only home to a small number of wild wolves.
Will this legal action delay the release of wolves in Colorado?
The key element to Monday's complaint is whether the ruling judge will allow for the continuation of wolf reintroduction into Colorado while the complaint is being ruled on. The legal process to determine a ruling regarding the complaint can take several years.
Andy Spann, a fifth-generation rancher from Gunnison and president of the Gunnison County Stockgrowers Association, said in the release that the organizations' concerns during the nearly three-year process to create a state wolf recovery plan were not adequately addressed.
"Impacts of wolf reintroduction, as would any other action of this magnitude, need to be properly reviewed to avoid unintended negative consequences to the natural environment, wildlife, and people of the impacted communities," he said.
Michael Saul, Rockies and Plains Program Director at Defenders of Wildlife, said in a news release the organization will work to see wolf reintroduction efforts continue. Defenders was one of several wildlife advocacy organizations to speak out against the lawsuit.
"Defenders is sorely disappointed by this transparent, 11th-hour attempt to delay efforts to bring wolves and their ecological benefits back to Colorado," he said. "Coloradans voted, the state worked extensively with ranchers and conservationists alike to prepare, and the lawful path forward is clear. Defenders stands poised to respond to ensure this last-minute maneuver will not thwart the historic return of the wolf."
Will wolverines go extinct?US offers new protections as climate change closes in
Colorado was under pressure to get environmental impact statement completed
Colorado paid the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service $1 million to complete the environmental impact statement. The state faced time constraints to get the statement completed in time for the 10(j) rule to go into effect before wolves were reintroduced.
Colorado Parks and Wildlife Director Jeff Davis previously praised the expedience in which the statement process was concluded, about half the time it normally takes.
"This demonstrates a sincere and effective commitment by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to accomplish this task on a very accelerated timeline," Davis said in a previous release. "National Environmental Policy Act work typically takes two to three years and it was accomplished in a little over a year-and-a-half."
Contributing: Trevor Hughes, USA TODAY
veryGood! (32183)
Related
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Police detain 233 people for alleged drug dealing at schools in Albania
- AP Week in Pictures: Asia
- Zelenskyy is expected to visit Capitol Hill as Congress is debating $21 billion in aid for Ukraine
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Sean Penn, Superpower co-director, says Zelenskyy changed as Russia invaded: Like he was born for this
- Escaped murderer Danelo Cavalcante told officials he planned to carjack someone and flee US
- Kirkland chicken tortilla soup mistakenly labeled gluten-free, USDA warns
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- Cruise ship that touts its navigation capabilities runs aground in Greenland with more than 200 onboard
Ranking
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- NSYNC is back! Hear a snippet of the group's first new song in 20 years
- Indiana man charged with child neglect after 2-year-old finds gun on bed and shoots him in the back
- Can Atlanta voters stop 'Cop City'? Why a vote could be 'transformative' for democracy
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Colleges with the most NFL players in 2023: Alabama leads for seventh straight year
- Iowa officer shot and killed while making an arrest; suspect arrested in Minnesota
- EU faces deadline on extending Ukrainian grain ban as countries threaten to pass their own
Recommendation
Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
Missing plane found in southern Michigan with pilot dead at crash site
With Russia isolated on the world stage, Putin turns to old friend North Korea for help
US names former commerce secretary, big Democrat donor to coordinate private sector aid for Ukraine
Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
Children's water beads activity kits sold at Target voluntarily recalled due to ingestion, choking risks
Ohio parents demand answers after video shows school worker hitting 3-year-old boy
Sharon Osbourne Shares Rare Photo of Kelly Osbourne’s Baby Boy Sidney
Tags
Like
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- After attacks, British prime minister says American XL Bully dogs are dangerous and will be banned
- Father of Kaylee Goncalves, one of four murdered University of Idaho students, says there is evidence his daughter fought back