Current:Home > reviewsTrader Joe's accused of pregnancy discrimination, retaliation in federal lawsuit -ProfitLogic
Trader Joe's accused of pregnancy discrimination, retaliation in federal lawsuit
View
Date:2025-04-14 14:37:06
A former Trader Joe’s employee is accusing the grocery chain of pregnancy discrimination and retaliation in a federal lawsuit filed on Tuesday in the U.S. District Court in Brooklyn, New York, alleging mistreatment and claiming that a change in the company's health insurance policy led to her coverage being wrongly revoked after she went on maternity leave.
Julia Hammer, 42, began her employment as a full-time employee at Trader Joe’s Lower East Side location in Manhattan on October 19, 2018, and was transferred upon her request in April 2021 – shortly before giving birth – to the grocery chain’s Long Island City location in Queens, according to the complaint obtained by ABC News.
Hammer claims in the lawsuit that upon returning to work from maternity leave in August 2021, her employer failed to provide her with a private and clean room to pump milk for her newborn child. According to the lawsuit, Hammer says that she had to “rely on an unsanitary mechanical room” that was often used by others -- an experience she said brought physical discomfort and pain when she couldn’t pump.
The lawsuit also details an alleged incident on Nov. 10, 2021, when a male co-worker walked in on her while she was pumping, leaving her “scared and very shaken up” as she found herself “completely exposed” and “in a vulnerable place.”
ABC News reached out to Trader Joe’s representatives to inquire about the grocery chain’s maternity leave policy and whether there’s a policy regarding providing mothers with lactation rooms.
The suit further alleges that after returning from maternity leave, Hammer learned in November 2021 that Trader Joe's health care coverage policy was set to change in 2022 and that her coverage would be revoked by Dec. 31, 2021, leaving her and her newborn child without health insurance. Hammer claims that losing her health insurance forced her to resign from Trader Joe’s in December 2021 to find a job that provided her with health insurance.
It is unclear what changes were made to Trader Joe’s health care coverage policy.
According to Trader Joe’s website, the grocery chain offers “medical, dental and vision plans to eligible Crew Members,” but it does not specify how many hours an employee needs to work.
ABC News has reached out to Trader Joe’s national representatives and management at its Long Island City location in Queens, but requests for comment were not immediately returned.
The suit claims that Hammer’s health care coverage was revoked “under the guise that Hammer did not meet the required number of hours to be eligible for her entitled benefits,” but also alleges that when calculating the “minimum number of hours to qualify for insurance, it became clear that Trader Joe’s was evaluating Hammer’s hours without considering that she went on [maternity] leave.”
Hammer, who is gay and became pregnant through insemination, also alleges in the complaint that she experienced “numerous discriminatory and offensive comments to her about pregnancy and childbirth” from co-workers and managers during her pregnancy at both locations.
"Returning to work after giving birth has many challenges, but the way Trader Joe’s treated me only made it more difficult,” Hammer told ABC News in a statement through her attorney on Tuesday. “From the anxiety and stress every time I had to pump in that horrible mechanical room, to me and my infant child losing health insurance during a pandemic, Trader Joe’s caused me and my family to suffer tremendously. Companies like Trader Joe’s that claim to care about their employees have a responsibility to support working mothers just like everyone else, and I want to help make sure this type of thing doesn’t happen to other people.”
According to the complaint, Hammer’s experience led her to seek professional help in December 2021 and she was ultimately prescribed anxiety medication, leading her to stop breastfeeding because she was concerned about the impact it could have on her child.
“Hammer felt profoundly disappointed and guilty about no longer providing milk to her child,” the complaint says.
According to the suit, Hammer is seeking unspecified emotional distress damages, financial compensation and attorney’s fees.
veryGood! (827)
Related
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- Tulsi Gabbard, who ran for 2020 Democratic nomination, endorses Trump against former foe Harris
- Is 'going no contact' the secret to getting your ex back? Maybe — but be careful.
- Kylie Kelce Reveals the Personal Change Jason Kelce Has Made Since NFL Retirement
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- How a Technology Similar to Fracking Can Store Renewable Energy Underground Without Lithium Batteries
- When do 2024 Paralympics start? What to know for Paris Games opening ceremony
- 'Yellowstone' First Look Week: Kayce and Monica Dutton survive into Season 5 second half
- Trump's 'stop
- Edgar Bronfman Jr. withdraws offer for Paramount, allowing Skydance merger to go ahead
Ranking
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Khloe Kardashian Admits She's Having a Really Hard Time as Daughter True Thompson Starts First Grade
- Pumpkin Everything! Our Favorite Pumpkin Home, Beauty, and Fashion Items
- Group charged with stealing dozens of firearms in string of Maryland gun shop burglaries
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- The Daily Money: Will new real estate rules hurt Black buyers?
- Princess Kate seen in rare outing for church service in Scotland
- LA to pay more than $38M for failing to make affordable housing accessible
Recommendation
Average rate on 30
Fake online reviews and testimonials are a headache for small businesses. They hope the FTC can help
This iPhone, iPad feature stops your kids from navigating out of apps, video tutorial
EPA Thought Industry-Funded Scientists Could Support Its Conclusion that a Long-Regulated Pesticide Is Not a Cancer Risk
Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
'Gossip Girl' actor Ed Westwick marries 'Supergirl' star Amy Jackson in Italy
As NFL's ultimate kickoff X-factor, Cordarrelle Patterson could produce big returns for Steelers
Judge says 4 independent and third-party candidates should be kept off Georgia presidential ballots